Making a difference

In order to convince other law professors to use the CPS (clickers) next year, I surveyed the students and received these reactions:

  •  The clickers help maintain student’s attention to class discussion by keeping them involved.
  •  It encourages participation where one might otherwise be too shy or hesitant to stick their neck out in front of the entire class.  By actually participating and committing to an answer I can see how well I actually know the material compared to how well I think I know it.  Plus, it’s a good gauge for me to see how well I understand the material compared to other people in the class.
  •  Since we started using them I really feel as though I’m learning a lot more. 

I then asked the professors who used them this semester if they thought that using the “clickers”made a difference.  Here’s what they said

  •   It bolstered interactive and varied teaching techniques
  • The clickers were useful to me to understand what the students were getting and what they weren’t getting. 
  •   I think that the in-class questions showed me that students weren’t learning things and allowed me to take remedial action.


At the same time, I came across a very interesting article in the Educause Review for this month entitled: The Myth about No Significant Difference. “…The problem is that to receive a valid answer, one needs to ask a good question. To get an answer as to whether technology makes a difference, we need to ask: “Difference in what?” For example, asking whether technology makes a difference in student learning implies that learning is a high-tech or no-tech phenomenon. The issue is not that simple. Learning occurs as a result of motivation, opportunities, an active process, interaction with others, and the ability to transfer learning to a real-world situation.”

This really hit home!! In order to assess whether or not to use a particular technology such as the “clickers,” professors need to look at some other questions.  This article points out several:

  • Do we think of technology as a solution in itself or as a means to an end?
  • Do we assume that using technology is an either/or proposition?
  • Have we identified those processes and activities we want to improve and looked at how technology can facilitate those actions?
  • Are we doing the same things with technology, or are we taking advantage of the unique capabilities of technology and redesigning our activities?

Listen to this articleListen to this article


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: